Through Halting a Harsh Conservative Welfare Policy, This Budget Clearly Sets Out How Labour Will Fight the Battle to Renew Britain
Yesterday, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour budget. People have been asking for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. Through the decisions made – a shift to a fairer tax system, targeting wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, quality public services and the living expenses – we have clearly demonstrated what we stand for.
That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began immediately.
The Main Political Divide in UK Politics
The primary division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to reform it so it benefits ordinary working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who support the current system and the failed ideology of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.
The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by every standard, they got far more dire. Their ideological austerity and trickle-down economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, reducing investment (causing us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.
Record of Decline Under the Previous Administration
Quality of life fell by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages remained flat, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people affected by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The record of failure continues.
A single budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a long-term plan for renewal and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the case for why our strategy will reap dividends.
Welfare Spending and Youth Deprivation
During the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to manage the effects instead of the solution.
That’s why we are building more affordable homes than for a generation, raising wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we pursue clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap
This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap.
For almost a decade, since it was enacted, low-income families with children have endured from a unjust social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and unethical.
Real Impact in Communities
I know from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in overcrowded, damp homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.
Lasting Effects of Child Poverty
Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among wealthier families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.
Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.
That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of failed conservative ideology. Now it is gone.
Fair Funding for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be explicit that these measures are being paid for in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Equity and direction – that’s how we will win the battle of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must seize back the political megaphone and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and win this struggle about how we will renew Britain and address the deep inequalities impeding progress.